Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol ; 2010 Jul-Aug; 76(4): 429-431
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-140663
2.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol ; 2009 Mar-Apr; 75(2): 157-61
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-52735

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMRs) can be of great use in dermatological data recording. Unfortunately, not many studies have been carried out in this specific area. AIMS: We attempt to evaluate the use of an EMR system in dermatology, comparing it with a conventional paper-based system. METHODS: Two hundred patient records of patients attending the dermatology outpatient department were studied over a 3-month period. Half the reports were entered in the conventional paper-based format while the other half was entered in an EMR system. The time taken for each consultation was recorded and the same was carried out for the first subsequent follow-up visit. RESULTS: The average time taken for the completion of the EMR-based consultation for new cases was 19.15 min (range, 10-30 min; standard deviation, 6.47). The paper-based consultation had an average time of 15.70 min (range, 5-25 min; standard deviation, 6.78). The P-value (T-test was used) was 0.002, which was significant. The average time taken for consultations and entering progress notes in the follow-up cases was slightly less than 10 min (9.7) for EMR while it was slightly more than 10 min (10.3) for the paper format. The difference was not statistically significant. The doctors involved also mentioned what they felt were the advantages and disadvantages of the system along with suggestions for improvement. CONCLUSION: The use of an EMR system in dermatology (or for that matter in any specialty) may overawe most users at the beginning, but once a comfort level is established, EMR is likely to outscore conventional paper recording systems. More time-motion-case studies are required to ascertain the optimal usage of EMR systems.

3.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol ; 2008 Sep-Oct; 74(5): 532-6
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-52063

ABSTRACT

Digital photography has virtually replaced conventional film photography as far as clinical imaging is concerned. Though most dermatologists are familiar with digital cameras, there is room for improvement in the quality of clinical images. We aim to give an overview of the basics of digital photography in relation to dermatology, which would be useful to a dermatologist in his or her future clinical practice.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL